Kasper v. Kasper

41 A.D.2d 841, 342 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from an order of .the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 15, 1972, which granted plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child custody and support, and a counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs. Any seeming inequity in a temporary order for alimony and support is to be remedied by a speedy trial where the rights of the parties can be finally determined (Mezzasalma v. Mezmsalma, 40 A D 2d 1018; Fleisig v. Fleisig, 4() A D 2d 609). Defendant, of course, is not precluded from making any application to Special Term with respect to visitation that he may deem appropriate. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kasper v. Kasper, 41 A.D.2d 841, 342 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 841 (Kasper v. Kasper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krohn v. Krohn
50 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)