Kasper Lamar Dobbs v. U.S. Marshals
This text of 139 F. App'x 777 (Kasper Lamar Dobbs v. U.S. Marshals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kasper Dobbs appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having reviewed the record de novo, see Appley Bros. v. United States, 7 F.3d 720, 722 (8th Cir.1993), we conclude dismissal was proper given the unrefuted evidence of Dobbs’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies, see Bellecourt v. United States, 994 F.2d 427, 430 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1109, 114 S.Ct. 1049, 127 L.Ed.2d 371 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny all pending motions.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kasper-lamar-dobbs-v-us-marshals-ca8-2005.