Kasper Lamar Dobbs v. U.S. Marshals

139 F. App'x 777
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2005
Docket04-3305
StatusUnpublished

This text of 139 F. App'x 777 (Kasper Lamar Dobbs v. U.S. Marshals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kasper Lamar Dobbs v. U.S. Marshals, 139 F. App'x 777 (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

*778 PER CURIAM.

Kasper Dobbs appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having reviewed the record de novo, see Appley Bros. v. United States, 7 F.3d 720, 722 (8th Cir.1993), we conclude dismissal was proper given the unrefuted evidence of Dobbs’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies, see Bellecourt v. United States, 994 F.2d 427, 430 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1109, 114 S.Ct. 1049, 127 L.Ed.2d 371 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny all pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Huntington, West Virginia v. United States
510 U.S. 1109 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Bellecourt v. United States
994 F.2d 427 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
Appley Bros. v. United States
7 F.3d 720 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kasper-lamar-dobbs-v-us-marshals-ca8-2005.