Kasler v. Howard

Fourth Circuit

Kasler v. Howard

78 F. App'x 231

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 2003

Docket03-1618

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 F. App'x 231 (Kasler v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kasler v. Howard, 78 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *232 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *232 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kasler-v-howard-ca4-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack