Kasler v. Howard

Fourth Circuit

Kasler v. Howard

78 F. App'x 231

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2003·No. 03-1618·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *232 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *232 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kasler v. Howard, 78 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

78 F. App'x 231 (Kasler v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related