Kase & Druker v. Fidelity New York Savings & Banking Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kase & Druker v. Fidelity New York Savings & Banking Center

138 A.D.2d 683, 526 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 683 (Kase & Druker v. Fidelity New York Savings & Banking Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kase & Druker v. Fidelity New York Savings & Banking Center, 138 A.D.2d 683, 526 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a turnover proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated July 17, 1987, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment against Fidelity New York Savings and Banking Center is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that aspect of the matter has been settled pursuant to stipulation dated November 4, 1987; and it is further,

Ordered that so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment against Maria Franzese is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Yachnin at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a turnover proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated July 17, 1987, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment against Fidelity New York Savings and Banking Center is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that aspect of the matter has been settled pursuant to stipulation dated November 4, 1987; and it is further,

Ordered that so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment against Maria Franzese is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Yachnin at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 683, 526 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kase-druker-v-fidelity-new-york-savings-banking-center-nyappdiv-1988.