Kasch v. Nelson

55 P. 118, 20 Wash. 315, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 525
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1898·No. No. 2976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record fails to show that this court has jurisdiction of the appeal in this case, both with regard to the giving of a notice of appeal and filing of a bond. There is a prepared notice in the. record, but no proof of its service or of the time of its filing. A copy of an appeal bond also appears, but with nothing to indicate when it was filed in the lower court. Eor these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kasch v. Nelson, 55 P. 118, 20 Wash. 315, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 525 (Wash. 1898).

55 P. 118 (Kasch v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Trumbull
73 P. 381 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)