Kasch v. Conrads
31 S.W.2d 630, 119 Tex. 449, 1930 Tex. LEXIS 144
Opinion
We do not think the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals [26 S.W.(2d) 732] should be in--terpreted as holding that defendants in error were entitled to recover regardless of whether damages were actually sustained by them.
The application for writ of error is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kasch v. Conrads, 31 S.W.2d 630, 119 Tex. 449, 1930 Tex. LEXIS 144 (Tex. 1930).
31 S.W.2d 630 (Kasch v. Conrads) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graves v. Diehl
958 S.W.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Stevens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
929 S.W.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Oliver v. Corzelius
215 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Greenspun v. Greenspun
194 S.W.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Collier v. Caraway
140 S.W.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)