Kartzinel v. Kartzinel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kartzinel v. Kartzinel

133 A.D.2d 145, 518 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 17, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.2d 145 (Kartzinel v. Kartzinel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kartzinel v. Kartzinel, 133 A.D.2d 145, 518 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an' order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated March 14, [146]*1461985, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order of the same court, dated December 6, 1984, granting the plaintiff wife certain pendente lite relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing the defendant husband to pay $175 per week in temporary child support, all carrying charges on the marital residence, and education costs for his children, and to maintain all existing insurance. Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an' order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated March 14, [146]*1461985, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order of the same court, dated December 6, 1984, granting the plaintiff wife certain pendente lite relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing the defendant husband to pay $175 per week in temporary child support, all carrying charges on the marital residence, and education costs for his children, and to maintain all existing insurance. Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 145, 518 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kartzinel-v-kartzinel-nyappdiv-1987.