Karth v. Orth
10 Cal. 192, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 211
Opinion
Field, J., concurring.
There being, in the record, no statement on appeal, we are confined to the judgment-roll, which being regular, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karth v. Orth, 10 Cal. 192, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 211 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 192 (Karth v. Orth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
E. Reinhart & Co. v. Company D
47 P. 979 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1897)
Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. Henry
39 P. 1054 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Henderson v. Morris
5 Or. 24 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1873)