Karth v. Orth
10 Cal. 192, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 211
This text of 10 Cal. 192 (Karth v. Orth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Karth v. Orth, 10 Cal. 192, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 211 (Cal. 1858).
Opinion
Field, J., concurring.
There being, in the record, no statement on appeal, we are confined to the judgment-roll, which being regular, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
E. Reinhart & Co. v. Company D
47 P. 979 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1897)
Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. Henry
39 P. 1054 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Henderson v. Morris
5 Or. 24 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1873)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 192, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karth-v-orth-cal-1858.