Karter v. Karter

471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1600, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14810
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1730
StatusPublished

This text of 471 So. 2d 646 (Karter v. Karter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karter v. Karter, 471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1600, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Holding that the record supports a determination by the trial court that the report of the general master was clearly erroneous, we affirm. See Reichman v. Reichman, 450 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Shaw
369 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Reichman v. Reichman
450 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1600, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karter-v-karter-fladistctapp-1985.