Karter v. Karter
471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1600, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14810
Opinion
Holding that the record supports a determination by the trial court that the report of the general master was clearly erroneous, we affirm. See Reichman v. Reichman, 450 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karter v. Karter, 471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1600, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
471 So. 2d 646 (Karter v. Karter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaw v. Shaw
369 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Reichman v. Reichman
450 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)