Karten v. Kent

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Karten v. Kent

559 So. 2d 384, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 1990 WL 40311

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1054

StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 384 (Karten v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karten v. Kent, 559 So. 2d 384, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 1990 WL 40311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 384, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 1990 WL 40311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karten-v-kent-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack