Karten v. Kent
559 So. 2d 384, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 1990 WL 40311
Opinion
Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karten v. Kent, 559 So. 2d 384, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 1990 WL 40311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
559 So. 2d 384 (Karten v. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WR Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach
512 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.
450 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)