Kartchner v. State Tax Commission

294 P.2d 790, 4 Utah 2d 382, 1956 Utah LEXIS 150
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 1956
Docket8398
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 294 P.2d 790 (Kartchner v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kartchner v. State Tax Commission, 294 P.2d 790, 4 Utah 2d 382, 1956 Utah LEXIS 150 (Utah 1956).

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from the dismissal of a quiet title action where the trial court held that one Bennett, judgment creditor of appellant Kartchner’s grantor, one Wyatt, had a lien superior to the title of Kartchner, whose deed predated the judgment, but which was recorded thereafter. Reversed with costs to appellant.

This situation has received different treatment by courts under varying recording acts. Most courts which have construed statutes similar to ours 1 have held, as we do here, that the judgment lien was subordinate and inferior to a deed which predated it, whether recorded after such judgment or whether not recorded at all. One of the most recent pronouncements to that effect is a case from our sister state of Idaho, 2 which we cite with approval.

We believe that had our legislature intended a rule otherwise, it would have provided, rather than giving the judgment creditor a lien on all the real property of the judgment debtor, that such judgment creditor should have a lien on all the real property recorded in the name of the judgment debtor, which would have been a simple matter, and which would have been an ac *384 tion taken by some of the legislatures of other states.

McDonough, c. j., and crockett, WADE and WORTHEN, JJ., concur.
1

. Title 78-22-1, Utah Code Annotated 1953. “Lien of Judgment. — From the time the judgment is docketed it becomes a lieu upon all the real property of tire judgment debtor * *

Title 57-3-3, Utah Code Annotated 1953. “Effect of failure to record.— Every conveyance of real estate hereafter made, which shall not be recorded as provided in this title, shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration *

2

. Johnson v. Casper, 1954, 75 Idaho 256, 270 P.2d 1012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirton McConkie PC v. ASC Utah LLC
2016 UT App 200 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2016)
Capital Assets Financial Services v. Lindsay
956 P.2d 1090 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1998)
Garland v. Fleischmann
831 P.2d 107 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
Lach v. Deseret Bank
746 P.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1987)
Butler v. Wilkinson
740 P.2d 1244 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987)
Barlow Society v. Commercial Security Bank
723 P.2d 398 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
Lund v. Donihue
674 P.2d 107 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)
Echols v. Olsen
347 N.E.2d 720 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 P.2d 790, 4 Utah 2d 382, 1956 Utah LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kartchner-v-state-tax-commission-utah-1956.