Kart v. United States

Third Circuit

Kart v. United States

104 F.2d 19, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1936

DocketNos. 5457, 5612, 5623

StatusPublished

This text of 104 F.2d 19 (Kart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kart v. United States, 104 F.2d 19, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

None of these men was an election officer. After careful examination of the proofs, we are of opinion that the evidence did not warrant the conviction in the case of any of them, and the judgments against them below are therefore reversed.

Supplemental Opinion.

Approving as we do of the Government’s view that no good purpose would be sub-served by pressing for a change of the Court’s previous decision in this case, the said decision is hereby restated and the Clerk is instructed to enter a new order reversing the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

None of these men was an election officer. After careful examination of the proofs, we are of opinion that the evidence did not warrant the conviction in the case of any of them, and the judgments against them below are therefore reversed.

Supplemental Opinion.

Approving as we do of the Government’s view that no good purpose would be sub-served by pressing for a change of the Court’s previous decision in this case, the said decision is hereby restated and the Clerk is instructed to enter a new order reversing the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 F.2d 19, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kart-v-united-states-ca3-1936.