Kart v. Kart

Supreme Court of Florida

Kart v. Kart

196 So. 485, 143 Fla. 274, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1190

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 So. 485 (Kart v. Kart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kart v. Kart, 196 So. 485, 143 Fla. 274, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1190 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The majority of the court are of the opinion that the record satisfiactorily shows that Sam Kart paid the mortgage here involved before he afterwards took an assignment of it to himself and Scruggs. Therefore, he could not take a valid assignment as against his wife, to whom he had previously conveyed the property and promised to pay the mortgage. It follows that the decree appealed from should be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield and Chapman, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The majority of the court are of the opinion that the record satisfiactorily shows that Sam Kart paid the mortgage here involved before he afterwards took an assignment of it to himself and Scruggs. Therefore, he could not take a valid assignment as against his wife, to whom he had previously conveyed the property and promised to pay the mortgage. It follows that the decree appealed from should be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield and Chapman, J. J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 485, 143 Fla. 274, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kart-v-kart-fla-1940.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack