Karrer v. City of Atlantic
95 A. 608, 88 N.J.L. 371, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 330
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, ' Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Vreden-BURGI-I, HePPBNHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karrer v. City of Atlantic, 95 A. 608, 88 N.J.L. 371, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1915).
95 A. 608 (Karrer v. City of Atlantic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.