Karreman v. Karreman

81 N.W. 576, 122 Mich. 654, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 630
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1900·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Moore, J.

A bill for divorce was filed by complainant in this cause, charging extreme cruelty on the part of the defendant. The testimony was taken in open court, and decree rendered by the circuit judge in accordance with the prayer of the bill. The questions involved are purely questions of fact, the discussion of which would not profit any one. The trial court saw the witnesses. The decree is justified by the evidence, under the rulings of this court in the following cases: Warner v. Warner, 54 Mich. 492; Hoyt v. Hoyt, 56 Mich. 50; Whitmore v. Whitmore, 49 Mich. 417; Briggs v. Briggs, 20 Mich. 34; Whitacre v. Whitacre, 64 Mich. 232; Cooper v. Cooper, 78 Mich. 316; Be Zwaan v. Be Zwaan, 91 Mich. 279; Nicholas v. Nicholas, 50 Mich. 162; Kirkland v. Kirkland, 111 Mich. 166; Bailey v. Bailey, 121 Mich. 236.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karreman v. Karreman, 81 N.W. 576, 122 Mich. 654, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 630 (Mich. 1900).

81 N.W. 576 (Karreman v. Karreman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butgereit v. Butgereit
154 N.W.2d 612 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1967)
Hartka v. Hartka
78 N.W.2d 133 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1956)
Brusseau v. Brusseau
219 Mich. 526 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Vollrath v. Vollrath
128 N.W. 190 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Donaldson v. Donaldson
96 N.W. 448 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)