Karr v. Karr

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Karr v. Karr

19 N.J. Eq. 427

DecidedFebruary 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.J. Eq. 427 (Karr v. Karr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karr v. Karr, 19 N.J. Eq. 427 (N.J. Ct. App. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Tiib Chancellor.

In this case, the notice has not been served or published in the manner required by law, and the rules of the court.

1. The 24th and 26th rules require, that after May 1st, 1867, a notice shall be served and published instead of the order. Two substantial parts of the notice prescribed are, that it shall not be entitled in the cause, and shall be directed to the defendant. The notice published is entitled in the cause, and is not directed to the defendant.

2. By the 22d section of the Chancery act, and 2d and 3d sections of the supplement of 1867, the notice is required to be served or mailed within twenty days after date of the order. In this case, the notice was not mailed until October 20th, being twenty-two days after the date of the order, (September 28th); and in fact, inquiry for the defendant’s address does not appear to havé been made in the manner required until October 19th, after the time had expired for giving notice.

The defendant is not brought as yet in the jurisdiction of the court, and no decree against him can be made, or would have validity if made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiib Chancellor.

In this case, the notice has not been served or published in the manner required by law, and the rules of the court.

1. The 24th and 26th rules require, that after May 1st, 1867, a notice shall be served and published instead of the order. Two substantial parts of the notice prescribed are, that it shall not be entitled in the cause, and shall be directed to the defendant. The notice published is entitled in the cause, and is not directed to the defendant.

2. By the 22d section of the Chancery act, and 2d and 3d sections of the supplement of 1867, the notice is required to be served or mailed within twenty days after date of the order. In this case, the notice was not mailed until October 20th, being twenty-two days after the date of the order, (September 28th); and in fact, inquiry for the defendant’s address does not appear to havé been made in the manner required until October 19th, after the time had expired for giving notice.

The defendant is not brought as yet in the jurisdiction of the court, and no decree against him can be made, or would have validity if made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.J. Eq. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karr-v-karr-njch-1869.