Karr v. Borchardt
This text of 711 N.E.2d 233 (Karr v. Borchardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Seneca App. No. 13-98-33. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-222, 99-223, and 99-224, infra.
would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, II, and III and hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.
would hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.E.2d 233, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1405, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karr-v-borchardt-ohio-1999.