Karr v. Borchardt

711 N.E.2d 233, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1405, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1835
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1999
Docket99-219
StatusPublished

This text of 711 N.E.2d 233 (Karr v. Borchardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karr v. Borchardt, 711 N.E.2d 233, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1405, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1835 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Seneca App. No. 13-98-33. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-222, 99-223, and 99-224, infra.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, II, and III and hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.

Cook, J.,

would hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 N.E.2d 233, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1405, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karr-v-borchardt-ohio-1999.