Karp v. Tremblay
294 N.E.2d 452, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800
Opinion
A review of the evidence and of the findings made thereon by the trial judge discloses that the bill was properly dismissed for the reason that the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proving that he and those with whom he claimed to be in privity had acquired a right of way over the locus by adverse use for an uninterrupted period of twenty years. G. L. c. 187, § 2. Sargent v. Ballard, 9 Pick. 251, 254. Tucker v. Poch, 321 Mass. 321, 323. Garrity v. Sherin, 346 Mass. 180.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karp v. Tremblay, 294 N.E.2d 452, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800 (Mass. Ct. App. 1973).
294 N.E.2d 452 (Karp v. Tremblay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garrity v. Sherin
190 N.E.2d 871 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1963)
Tucker v. Poch
73 N.E.2d 595 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)