Karp v. Tremblay

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Karp v. Tremblay

294 N.E.2d 452, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800

DecidedJanuary 8, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 294 N.E.2d 452 (Karp v. Tremblay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karp v. Tremblay, 294 N.E.2d 452, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800 (Mass. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

A review of the evidence and of the findings made thereon by the trial judge discloses that the bill was properly dismissed for the reason that the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proving that he and those with whom he claimed to be in privity had acquired a right of way over the locus by adverse use for an uninterrupted period of twenty years. G. L. c. 187, § 2. Sargent v. Ballard, 9 Pick. 251, 254. Tucker v. Poch, 321 Mass. 321, 323. Garrity v. Sherin, 346 Mass. 180.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A review of the evidence and of the findings made thereon by the trial judge discloses that the bill was properly dismissed for the reason that the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proving that he and those with whom he claimed to be in privity had acquired a right of way over the locus by adverse use for an uninterrupted period of twenty years. G. L. c. 187, § 2. Sargent v. Ballard, 9 Pick. 251, 254. Tucker v. Poch, 321 Mass. 321, 323. Garrity v. Sherin, 346 Mass. 180.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 N.E.2d 452, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karp-v-tremblay-massappct-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack