Karp v. Steinberg
This text of 101 A.D.3d 567 (Karp v. Steinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the record demonstrates that there is no evidence to establish that decedent’s death was caused in part by sepsis, petitioners’ claim was properly dismissed at the summary judgment stage. Moreover, given that decedent’s sepsis was improving when he decided to stop receiving treatment, it cannot be shown that sepsis — rather than decedent’s competent decision to refuse further treatment, and the resulting uremia — caused his death (cf. People v Snow, 79 AD3d 1252, 1253 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 800 [2011]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Moskowitz, Freedman and Abdus-Saalam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.3d 567, 957 N.Y.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karp-v-steinberg-nyappdiv-2012.