Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.

Second Circuit

Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.

426 F. App'x 20

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 12, 2011·No. No. 10-2712-cv·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.), which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir.2011). Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons expressed in the district court’s opinion.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.), which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir.2011). Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons expressed in the district court’s opinion.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C., 426 F. App'x 20 (2d Cir. 2011).

Pincite

426 F. App'x 20 (Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related