Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.

426 F. App'x 20
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 12, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2712-cv
StatusPublished

This text of 426 F. App'x 20 (Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C., 426 F. App'x 20 (2d Cir. 2011).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.), which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir.2011). Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons expressed in the district court’s opinion.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.
639 F.3d 557 (Second Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 F. App'x 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karoon-v-franklin-weinrib-rudell-vassallo-pc-ca2-2011.