Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.
This text of 426 F. App'x 20 (Karoon v. Franklin, Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.), which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir.2011). Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons expressed in the district court’s opinion.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 F. App'x 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karoon-v-franklin-weinrib-rudell-vassallo-pc-ca2-2011.