Karling v. Budget Rent a Car System, Inc.

2 So. 3d 356, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618, 2009 WL 275183
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2009·No. 5D08-310·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

LAWSON, J.

Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, the appellant, Christopher J. Karling, moved for certification of a question of great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question in accordance with rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, as one of great public importance:

DOES THE GRAVES AMENDMENT, 49 U.S.C. § 30106, PREEMPT SECTION 324.021(9)(B)(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (2007)?

This is the same question recently certified by the Second District in West v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 997 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), and by the Fourth District in Tocha v. Richardson, 995 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) and Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 993 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

QUESTION CERTIFIED.

ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karling v. Budget Rent a Car System, Inc., 2 So. 3d 356, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618, 2009 WL 275183 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

2 So. 3d 356 (Karling v. Budget Rent a Car System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fair v. Reese
6 So. 3d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)