Karlin v. Pooley
This text of 122 Misc. 463 (Karlin v. Pooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court to render judgment upon confession is specifically limited to the rendering of such judgment “ in an action ” (Mun. Ct. Code, § 6, subd. 3) as distinguished from a judgment on confession rendered in the Supreme Court “ without action ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 540), and as no action was pending at the time of the entry of the judgment herein, it was error to deny the motion to vacate the judgment and the proceedings based thereon.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, Mullan and Lydon, JJ.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 Misc. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karlin-v-pooley-nyappterm-1924.