Karl W. Leo and Fay L. Leo v. Shelley D. Gregory

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 2023
Docket2023-1685
StatusPublished

This text of Karl W. Leo and Fay L. Leo v. Shelley D. Gregory (Karl W. Leo and Fay L. Leo v. Shelley D. Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl W. Leo and Fay L. Leo v. Shelley D. Gregory, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2023-1685 _____________________________

KARL W. LEO and FAY L. LEO,

Appellants,

v.

SHELLEY D. GREGORY,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jennifer J. Frydrychowicz, Judge.

December 6, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses this appeal because the order sought to be reviewed does not constitute a final judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l) (“Except as provided in rule 9.020(h), if a notice of appeal is filed before rendition of a final order, the appeal shall be subject to dismissal as premature.”). The order disposes of the motions for final summary judgment but fails to enter a final judgment declaring the rights or obligations of the parties. See § 86.011, Fla. Stat. (2023) (stating that the circuit court may “declare rights, status, and other equitable or legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed,” and “[t]he court’s declaration may be either affirmative or negative in form and effect and such declaration has the force and effect of a final judgment”). Dismissal is thus appropriate. See Dockery v. Hood, 889 So. 2d 221, 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing an order titled, “Final Declaratory Judgment,” because it merely granted a motion for summary judgment and was nonfinal).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Megan F. Fry of Clark Partington, Pensacola; Bailey Howard and Trevor A. Thompson of Clark Partington, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

No appearance for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dockery v. Hood
889 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karl W. Leo and Fay L. Leo v. Shelley D. Gregory, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-w-leo-and-fay-l-leo-v-shelley-d-gregory-fladistctapp-2023.