Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Karl v. Frazier

Karl v. Frazier

164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1956
DocketNo. 34600
StatusPublished

This text of 164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 (Karl v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl v. Frazier, 164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 (Ohio 1956).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Bell, JJ., concur. Taft, J., concurs for the reason that the claimed constitutional questions could have been but were not raised in the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-v-frazier-ohio-1956.