Karl Thomas Belfield v. W.D. Rogers, Warden
This text of 813 F.2d 400 (Karl Thomas Belfield v. W.D. Rogers, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
813 F.2d 400
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Karl Thomas BELFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.D. ROGERS, Warden, Defendant-Appellee,
No. 86-6691.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 17, 1986.
Decided: Dec. 3, 1986.
Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Karl Thomas Belfield, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Belfield v. Rogers, C/A No. 85-833-N (E.D.Va., June 3, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
813 F.2d 400, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34244, 1986 WL 18630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-thomas-belfield-v-wd-rogers-warden-ca4-1986.