Karl Thomas Belfield v. W.D. Rogers, Warden

813 F.2d 400, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34244, 1986 WL 18630
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 1986·No. 86-6691·Unpublished

Opinion

813 F.2d 400
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Karl Thomas BELFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.D. ROGERS, Warden, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 86-6691.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 1986.
Decided: Dec. 3, 1986.

Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Karl Thomas Belfield, appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Belfield v. Rogers, C/A No. 85-833-N (E.D.Va., June 3, 1986).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karl Thomas Belfield v. W.D. Rogers, Warden, 813 F.2d 400, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34244, 1986 WL 18630 (4th Cir. 1986).

813 F.2d 400 (Karl Thomas Belfield v. W.D. Rogers, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related