Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 909, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1633
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 27, 1967
DocketNo. P67/415; No. P67/416; No. P67/417; No. P67/418; No. P67/419; No. P67/420
StatusPublished
This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 909 (Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 909, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1633 (cusc 1967).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gamble Vargish & Co. v. Untied States
57 Cust. Ct. 448 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
59 Cust. Ct. 909, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-schroff-associates-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.