Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 383
United States Customs Court·Decided November 29, 1961·No. No. 66235; protests 58/25409-10257 and 59/15587-10784 (Chicago)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the merchandise was held dutiable, as claimed, at the applicable rates in effect on the respective dates of importation under the pertinent trade agreements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1961).
47 Cust. Ct. 383 (Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marshall Field & Co. v. United States
45 C.C.P.A. 72 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1958)