Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 383
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 29, 1961
DocketNo. 66235; protests 58/25409-10257 and 59/15587-10784 (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 47 Cust. Ct. 383 (Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the merchandise was held dutiable, as claimed, at the applicable rates in effect on the respective dates of importation under the pertinent trade agreements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall Field & Co. v. United States
45 C.C.P.A. 72 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Cust. Ct. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-schroff-assoc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.