Karl Pierce v. Dr. Benjamin Sanders

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedAugust 24, 2015
Docket72542-4
StatusUnpublished

This text of Karl Pierce v. Dr. Benjamin Sanders (Karl Pierce v. Dr. Benjamin Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl Pierce v. Dr. Benjamin Sanders, (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

£UfO Alio £4 Ail o- j;

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

KARL PIERCE, ) DIVISION ONE Appellant, ) No. 72542-4-1

UNPUBLISHED OPINION DR. BENJAMIN SANDERS and ) DR. JENNIFER DOE, )

Respondents. ) FILED: August 24, 2015

Per Curiam — Karl Pierce attempted to file this action for damages in King

County Superior Court and moved for a waiver of the filing fee. The trial court found

Pierce indigent, but refused to waive the filing fee on the grounds that 'the Non-Claim

statute [was] not followed." We granted Pierce's motion for discretionary review and

now reverse.1

In Jafar v. Webb. 177 Wn.2d 520, 532, 303 P.3d 1042 (2013), our Supreme

Court held that once the trial court determines that a civil litigant is indigent under GR

34, it must waive all filing fees and surcharges:

We hold GR 34 provides a uniform standard for determining whether an individual is indigent and further requires the court to waive all fees and costs for individuals who meet this standard. The rule was adopted to ensure that indigent litigants have equal access to justice. Any fees required of indigent litigants are invalid and must be waived under the rule.

See also Sobota v. Mahlik, Wn. App. , 348 P.3d 1222 (2015).

1The King County Prosecutor's Office appeared on behalf of respondent Dr. Benjamin Sanders, but did not file any objections or pleadings. No. 72542-4-1/2

Here, the trial court found Pierce was indigent under GR 34(a)(3)(B) ("his or her

household income is at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty guideline").

Consequently, the court erred in denying Pierce's request for a filing fee waiver.

We reverse the trial court's order and remand with instructions to grant a waiver

only of filing fees and surcharges in accordance with Gr 34 and Jafar.

Reversed and remanded.

FOR THE COURT: ~T^

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jafar v. Webb
303 P.3d 1042 (Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
Sobota v. Mahlik
348 P.3d 1222 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karl Pierce v. Dr. Benjamin Sanders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-pierce-v-dr-benjamin-sanders-washctapp-2015.