Karl Lee Wiggins v. State
This text of Karl Lee Wiggins v. State (Karl Lee Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-20-00401-CR
Karl Lee Wiggins, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 72941, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In June of 2015, in cause number 72941, appellant Karl Lee Wiggins pled guilty
to murder, and the trial court sentenced him to life in prison. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.32;
19.02. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction. Wiggins v. State,
No. 03-15-00385-CR, 2016 WL 3679141, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin June 30, 2016, no pet.)
(mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandate affirming the trial court’s judgment of
conviction was issued on September 15, 2016.
On August 6, 2020, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal of his conviction
pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.1 Appellant has already
appealed his murder conviction, and mandate has issued. He is not entitled to a second appeal of
1As an initial matter, we note that a Texas criminal defendant’s right to appeal a criminal conviction resulting from a state criminal action is governed by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure not the Federal Rules of Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 1.1, 25.2(a)(2); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02. this conviction. See Hines v. State, 70 S.W. 955, 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1902) (“[O]nly one
appeal can be made from a verdict and judgment of conviction in any case.”). Therefore, this
Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second appeal from appellant’s final conviction.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see,
e.g., Arabzadegan v. State, No. 03-19-00728-CR, 2020 WL 370880, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin
Jan. 23, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing defendant’s
subsequent appeal of conviction that had previously been affirmed for want of jurisdiction);
McDonald v. State, 401 S.W.3d 360, 361–63 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2013, pet. ref’d) (same).
__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: September 29, 2020
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Karl Lee Wiggins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-lee-wiggins-v-state-texapp-2020.