Karl Feller v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States, as Successor to Alien Property Custodian

201 F.2d 670
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 19, 1953·No. 10865·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions in this case which come to us on appeal are questions of fact solely concerning the ownership of stock in an American corporation which is claimed by the successor to the alien property custodian to be German owned at the date of seizure. The questions of fact involve the examination of a very considerable amount of evidence. The district judge considered each of these questions and came to' the conclusion that alien ownership was established satisfactorily. He wrote a careful opinion in which his reasons for the conclusions were explained. D.C., 106 F.Supp. 147. We agree with him and for the reasons he stated.

The judgment of. the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karl Feller v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States, as Successor to Alien Property Custodian, 201 F.2d 670 (3d Cir. 1953).

201 F.2d 670 (Karl Feller v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States, as Successor to Alien Property Custodian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorraine Sanden v. Mayo Clinic
495 F.2d 221 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
J. Robert Bonnar v. The United States
438 F.2d 540 (Court of Claims, 1971)
Manufacturers Trust Company v. Kennedy
291 F.2d 460 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Kennedy
291 F.2d 460 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Bank of Philippine Islands v. Rogers
165 F. Supp. 100 (District of Columbia, 1958)
FAR Liquidating Corporation v. Brownell
130 F. Supp. 691 (D. Delaware, 1955)