Karl B. Bailey v. MidFirst Bank
This text of Karl B. Bailey v. MidFirst Bank (Karl B. Bailey v. MidFirst Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2016
NO. 03-14-00632-CV
Karl B. Bailey, Appellant
v.
MidFirst Bank, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on July 2, 2014. Appellant has
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the
motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The
appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Karl B. Bailey v. MidFirst Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-b-bailey-v-midfirst-bank-texapp-2016.