Karl Adams v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 6, 2005
Docket04-05-00370-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Karl Adams v. State (Karl Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl Adams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion


MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-05-00370-CR


Karl ADAMS,

Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,

Appellee


From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CR-1067W

Honorable Mary Roman, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   July 6, 2005


DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

            The trial court imposed sentence on March 28, 2005. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed April 27, 2005. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 12, 2005. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant, however, did not file his notice of appeal until June 1, 2005. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.

            We, therefore, ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, appellant recognizes that his notice of appeal was untimely filed, but asks that we retain jurisdiction because appellant’s counsel was unaware of appellant’s desire to appeal until after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal passed. We are without jurisdiction to grant such relief. Appellant must present such a claim to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in seeking an out-of-time appeal. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App.1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

            We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karl Adams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-adams-v-state-texapp-2005.