Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek

Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek

391 So. 2d 782, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1980
DocketNo. 79-2604
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 391 So. 2d 782 (Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek, 391 So. 2d 782, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal over two months after entry of the written order which he wants us to review. We do not have jurisdiction unless an appropriate motion for rehearing tolled the time for filing [783]*783a notice of appeal. Appellant relies upon a motion for rehearing filed after the court’s oral ruling but before entry of a written order. We dismiss the appeal. See Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Seminole County, 302 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MOORE, BERANEK and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Zimbrick
453 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Florida Coast Bank of Pompano Beach v. Kimmitt
446 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 So. 2d 782, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karl-a-kandell-associates-inc-v-urbanek-fladistctapp-1980.