Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek
391 So. 2d 782, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1980·No. No. 79-2604·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant filed a notice of appeal over two months after entry of the written order which he wants us to review. We do not have jurisdiction unless an appropriate motion for rehearing tolled the time for filing [783] a notice of appeal. Appellant relies upon a motion for rehearing filed after the court’s oral ruling but before entry of a written order. We dismiss the appeal. See Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Seminole County, 302 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek, 391 So. 2d 782, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
391 So. 2d 782 (Karl A. Kandell Associates, Inc. v. Urbanek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Zimbrick
453 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Florida Coast Bank of Pompano Beach v. Kimmitt
446 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)