Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner

530 U.S. 1241, 120 S. Ct. 2705, 147 L. Ed. 2d 959, 68 U.S.L.W. 3773, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4293
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 19, 2000
DocketNo. 99-9517
StatusPublished

This text of 530 U.S. 1241 (Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner, 530 U.S. 1241, 120 S. Ct. 2705, 147 L. Ed. 2d 959, 68 U.S.L.W. 3773, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4293 (2000).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noneriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 U.S. 1241, 120 S. Ct. 2705, 147 L. Ed. 2d 959, 68 U.S.L.W. 3773, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karim-panahi-v-commissioner-scotus-2000.