Kariem A. Bilal v. David Mapp, Sheriff, Chief Jailor, Norfolk City Jail Major Sterling, Jailor Colonel Ellis Deputy Vincent

46 F.3d 1122, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6672, 1995 WL 32635
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1995
Docket93-7140
StatusUnpublished

This text of 46 F.3d 1122 (Kariem A. Bilal v. David Mapp, Sheriff, Chief Jailor, Norfolk City Jail Major Sterling, Jailor Colonel Ellis Deputy Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kariem A. Bilal v. David Mapp, Sheriff, Chief Jailor, Norfolk City Jail Major Sterling, Jailor Colonel Ellis Deputy Vincent, 46 F.3d 1122, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6672, 1995 WL 32635 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

46 F.3d 1122

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kariem A. BILAL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
David MAPP, Sheriff, Chief Jailor, Norfolk City Jail; Major
Sterling, Jailor; Colonel Ellis; Deputy Vincent,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 93-7140.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1994.
Decided Jan. 27, 1995.

Kariem A. Bilal, Appellant Pro Se. Palmer St. Clair Rutherford, Jr., Mark Douglas Stiles, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bilal v. Mapp, No. CA-93-448-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 F.3d 1122, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6672, 1995 WL 32635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kariem-a-bilal-v-david-mapp-sheriff-chief-jailor-n-ca4-1995.