Karidis v. Trampas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Karidis v. Trampas

207 Ill. App. 302, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 633

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 2, 1917

DocketGen. No. 23,076

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 Ill. App. 302 (Karidis v. Trampas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karidis v. Trampas, 207 Ill. App. 302, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 633 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Landlord and tenant, § 413* — when consent By lessee to assignment of lease By assignee to other persons shown. Evidence held sufficient to show the consent of lessees of premises to assignment of the lease by the assignee to other persons and acceptance of the obligation of such subsequent assignees in place of that of the first assignee. 3. Appeal and error, § 1303* — when presumed that evidence omitted from hill of exceptions warranted judgment. Where a bill of exceptions states that it contains all of the evidence but it shows on its face that it does not, it will be presumed that the omitted evidence justified the finding and judgment of the trial court. 4. Landlord and tenant, § 416* — when lessee may not recover from assignee rent paid By lessee to lessor. Where a lessee has failed to perform his agreement to procure the written consent of the lessor to an assignment of the lease, he cannot recover from the assignee rent paid to the lessor due to the default of the assignees of such assignee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Landlord and tenant, § 413* — when consent By lessee to assignment of lease By assignee to other persons shown. Evidence held sufficient to show the consent of lessees of premises to assignment of the lease by the assignee to other persons and acceptance of the obligation of such subsequent assignees in place of that of the first assignee. 3. Appeal and error, § 1303* — when presumed that evidence omitted from hill of exceptions warranted judgment. Where a bill of exceptions states that it contains all of the evidence but it shows on its face that it does not, it will be presumed that the omitted evidence justified the finding and judgment of the trial court. 4. Landlord and tenant, § 416* — when lessee may not recover from assignee rent paid By lessee to lessor. Where a lessee has failed to perform his agreement to procure the written consent of the lessor to an assignment of the lease, he cannot recover from the assignee rent paid to the lessor due to the default of the assignees of such assignee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 302, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karidis-v-trampas-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack