Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedMay 11, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-01180
StatusUnknown

This text of Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou (Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01180-FMO-GJS Document 13 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 22-1180-FMO (GJSx) Date May 11, 2022 Title Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou et al

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal Re: Lack of Prosecution Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, a defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a). The court may dismiss the action prior to the 90 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action. With respect to service of individuals and/or business entities in a foreign country, plaintiff shall exercise all reasonable diligence and attempt service within the 90-day time period. In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 24, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b), the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of: X Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s): all defendants X An answer by the following defendant(s): all defendants 9 Plaintiff’s application for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a): 9 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b): on or before the date indicated above. Failure to file a timely response to this Order to Show Cause shall result in the action or the above defendant(s) being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court. See Local Rule 41; Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 & 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 00 : 00 Initials of Preparer gga CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karen Zavala v. Ur Jaddou, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-zavala-v-ur-jaddou-cacd-2022.