Karen Williamson v. Christus Spohn Hospital

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 2, 2002
Docket13-02-00127-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Karen Williamson v. Christus Spohn Hospital (Karen Williamson v. Christus Spohn Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karen Williamson v. Christus Spohn Hospital, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-127-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

KAREN WILLIAMSON,                                                           Appellant,

                                                   v.

CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL, ET AL.,                                   Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

                         On appeal from the 28th District Court

                                  of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, KAREN WILLIAMSON, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 01-4668-A.  The clerk=s record was received on March 4, 2002. 


Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 2nd day of May, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karen Williamson v. Christus Spohn Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-williamson-v-christus-spohn-hospital-texapp-2002.