Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et
Opinion
PRECEDENTIAL
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 09-4055
KAREN V. CAPPUCCIO,
Appellant
v.
PRIME CAPITAL FUNDING LLC; KIRK AYZENBERG;
AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER; COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA;
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.;
FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION;
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, L.L.C. a GMAC Company;
MAK ABSTRACT; E*TRADE, d/b/a E*Trade Financial Corporate Services, Inc., d/b/a E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
On Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (No. 07-cv-04627)
District Judge: Honorable Juan R. Sánchez
Before: FUENTES, FISHER, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It appears that the opinion filed on August 16, 2011, incorrectly referred to title 15 U.S.C. Section 1691 as the U.S. Equal Opportunity Act rather than the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. At the direction of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that page 8, section B, first paragraph of the opinion is amended as follows:
Cappuccio brought claims against the lenders, Countrywide and First Magnus, for (1) damages, rescission, and injunctive relief under TILA; (2) common law fraud; (3) statutory fraud under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”), 73 P.S. § 201-2; and (4) violations of the adverse action notice requirement of the U.S. Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1691.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: September 29, 2011 cc: Cary L. Flitter, Esq. Theodore E. Lorenz, Esq. Andrew M. Milz, Esq. Joseph F. Riga, Esq. Irv Ackelsberg, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et (Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.