Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 29, 2011
Docket09-4055
StatusPublished

This text of Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et (Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et, (3d Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 09-4055 _____________

KAREN V. CAPPUCCIO, Appellant

v.

PRIME CAPITAL FUNDING LLC; KIRK AYZENBERG; AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER; COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, L.L.C. a GMAC Company; MAK ABSTRACT; E*TRADE, d/b/a E*Trade Financial Corporate Services, Inc., d/b/a E*Trade Mortgage Corporation

On Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (No. 07-cv-04627) District Judge: Honorable Juan R. Sánchez

Before: FUENTES, FISHER, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appears that the opinion filed on August 16, 2011, incorrectly referred to title 15 U.S.C. Section 1691 as the U.S. Equal Opportunity Act rather than the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. At the direction of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that page 8, section B, first paragraph of the opinion is amended as follows:

Cappuccio brought claims against the lenders, Countrywide and First Magnus, for (1) damages, rescission, and injunctive relief under TILA; (2) common law fraud; (3) statutory fraud under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”), 73 P.S. § 201-2; and (4) violations of the adverse action notice requirement of the U.S. Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1691.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: September 29, 2011 cc: Cary L. Flitter, Esq. Theodore E. Lorenz, Esq. Andrew M. Milz, Esq. Joseph F. Riga, Esq. Irv Ackelsberg, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scope of prohibition
15 U.S.C. § 1691

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karen v. Cappuccio v. Prime Capital Funding, LLC Et, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-v-cappuccio-v-prime-capital-funding-llc-et-ca3-2011.