Karen Ritter v. Leslie Douglas Harris

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 19, 2005
Docket13-03-00578-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Karen Ritter v. Leslie Douglas Harris (Karen Ritter v. Leslie Douglas Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karen Ritter v. Leslie Douglas Harris, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-578-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

KAREN RITTER,                                                                Appellant,


v.


LESLIE DOUGLAS HARRIS,                                                 Appellee.


On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, KAREN RITTER, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2002-07-2757-G. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and that the parties have agreed that the June 30, 2003 final judgment should be vacated and an agreed final order should be entered to replace the final judgment. Appellant requests that this Court set aside the June 30, 2003 final judgment without regard to the merits, tax the costs of this appeal against the party incurring same, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant’s motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of May, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Karen Ritter v. Leslie Douglas Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-ritter-v-leslie-douglas-harris-texapp-2005.