Karen L. Battaglia v. MDC Concourse Center
This text of Karen L. Battaglia v. MDC Concourse Center (Karen L. Battaglia v. MDC Concourse Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 38 SSM 29 Karen L. Battaglia, Appellant, v. MDC Concourse Center, LLC, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by John A. Collins, for appellant. Submitted by Kelly J. Philips, for respondents MDC Concourse Center, LLC et al. Submitted by Kevin E. Loftus, for respondent R. D. Trucking & Transportation, Inc.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. In this context, defendants MDC Concourse Center, LLC; McGuire Development Company, LLC; Maguire Management Company, LLC; and R.D. Trucking & Transportation, Inc. established prima facie their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by “submitting uncontroverted evidence that a storm was ongoing at the time of [plaintiff]’s fall” (Sherman v New York State Thruway Auth., 27 NY3d 1019, 1021 [2016]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable question of fact. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided February 18, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Karen L. Battaglia v. MDC Concourse Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-l-battaglia-v-mdc-concourse-center-ny-2020.