Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain

Court of Appeals of Texas

Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain

DecidedOctober 7, 2014

Docket01-14-00647-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain (Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-14-00647-CV Style: Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole Sain Date motion filed*: October 1, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Clerk’s Record & Filing Fees Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Written confirmation of payment of Clerk’s Record and Filing Fees

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due dates: 8/21/14 (Filing Fee) & 9/6/14 (Clerk’s Record) Number of extensions granted: 0-Current Due Dates: 9/22/14 (Fee) & 10/10/14 (CR) Date Requested: November 30, 2014

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: December 1, 2014  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant was sent notices by the Clerk of this Court about the filing fee that was due by September 22, 2014, and the Clerk’s Record fee, now due by October 10, 2014. However, because appellant is pro se and provided evidence of problems receiving her mail, her motion is granted, but no further extensions will be granted. Accordingly, if appellant fails to provide written confirmation of payment of both filing and Clerk’s Record fees by December 1, 2014, the Court may dismiss the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 42.3(c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: October 7, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-14-00647-CV Style: Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole Sain Date motion filed*: October 1, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Clerk’s Record & Filing Fees Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Written confirmation of payment of Clerk’s Record and Filing Fees

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due dates: 8/21/14 (Filing Fee) & 9/6/14 (Clerk’s Record) Number of extensions granted: 0-Current Due Dates: 9/22/14 (Fee) & 10/10/14 (CR) Date Requested: November 30, 2014

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: December 1, 2014  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant was sent notices by the Clerk of this Court about the filing fee that was due by September 22, 2014, and the Clerk’s Record fee, now due by October 10, 2014. However, because appellant is pro se and provided evidence of problems receiving her mail, her motion is granted, but no further extensions will be granted. Accordingly, if appellant fails to provide written confirmation of payment of both filing and Clerk’s Record fees by December 1, 2014, the Court may dismiss the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 42.3(c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: October 7, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jason B. Ostrom and Nicole K. Sain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-kristine-silvio-v-jason-b-ostrom-and-nicole--texapp-2014.