Karen Houston and Houson North Shore Peninsula, LTD v. Jerry Kirchman & Associates, and Carl Strube

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 27, 2015·No. 05-14-01622-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01622-CV

KAREN HOUSTON, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JERRY KIRCHMAN & ASSOCIATES, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 81,238

ORDER

Appellants’ brief is past due. Before the Court is the July 9, 2015 pro se motion of appellants Karen Houston and Houston Northshore Peninsula, Ltd. seeking an extension to “hire another attorney or prepare pro se.” In the motion, appellants state that their attorney, Teresa Robbins, has informed them that she will not handle their appeal. However, Ms. Robbins has not filed a motion to withdraw with this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, Ms. Robbins is still the attorney of record for appellants. Accordingly, the Court takes no action on appellants’ pro se motion.

On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellants to file a brief WITHIN FORTY-

FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karen Houston and Houson North Shore Peninsula, LTD v. Jerry Kirchman & Associates, and Carl Strube, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Karen Houston and Houson North Shore Peninsula, LTD v. Jerry Kirchman & Associates, and Carl Strube (Karen Houston and Houson North Shore Peninsula, LTD v. Jerry Kirchman & Associates, and Carl Strube) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.