Karen Gorski v. At&t Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 2016·No. 153441·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 15, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

153441 & (15)(16) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

KAREN GORSKI, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153441 COA: 329039 Macomb CC: 2013-003803-NF AT&T MICHIGAN, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

and JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for a stay of proceedings is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 15, 2016

a0412 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karen Gorski v. At&t Michigan, (Mich. 2016).

Karen Gorski v. At&t Michigan (Karen Gorski v. At&t Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.