Karen Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: May 22, 2012
• Docket: 12-15388
• Status: Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN GOLINSKI,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN No. 12-15388 BERRY, Director of the United States Office of Personnel D.C. No. Management, in his official  3:10-cv-00257-JSW Northern District capacity, Defendants, of California, San Francisco and BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. 

5873 5874 GOLINSKI v. U.S. OPM

KAREN GOLINSKI,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN No. 12-15409 BERRY, Director of the United D.C. No. States Office of Personnel 3:10-cv-00257-JSW Management, in his official  Northern District capacity, of California, Defendants-Appellants, San Francisco and ORDER BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant.  Filed May 22, 2012

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator.

ORDER

Pursuant to G.O. 5.2, the petition for initial hearing en banc was circulated to the court. A time was established by which any judge could request a vote on the petition. No judge requested a vote within the time period. Therefore, the peti- tion for initial hearing en banc is denied.

Chief Judge Kozinski and Judge Reinhardt did not partici- pate in the consideration of this matter. GOLINSKI v. U.S. OPM 5875 The order filed April 11, 2012, remains in effect. The Clerk shall calendar these consolidated appeals for argument before a three-judge panel during the week of September 10-14, 2012, in San Francisco.