Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal.

DecidedFebruary 14, 2002

Docket13-01-00470-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal. (Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-01-470-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

DAVID AND KAREN WILLIAMSON , Appellants,

v.

NAOMI RUTH ABERNATHY, ET AL. , Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, DAVID AND KAREN WILLIAMSON , attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in Cause No. 01-0333-A . The clerk's record was received on November 2, 2001 .

Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants' response to this Court's notice was received on December 13, 2001; however, to date, appellants have failed to cure the defect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' failure to cure the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 14^th day of February, 2002 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-01-470-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

DAVID AND KAREN WILLIAMSON , Appellants,

v.

NAOMI RUTH ABERNATHY, ET AL. , Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, DAVID AND KAREN WILLIAMSON , attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in Cause No. 01-0333-A . The clerk's record was received on November 2, 2001 .

Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants' response to this Court's notice was received on December 13, 2001; however, to date, appellants have failed to cure the defect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' failure to cure the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 14^th day of February, 2002 .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Karen and David Williamson v. Naomi Ruth Abernathy, Etal., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karen-and-david-williamson-v-naomi-ruth-abernathy--texapp-2002.