Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

374 N.W.2d 733, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1272

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 18, 1985

DocketNo. C0-85-115

StatusPublished

This text of 374 N.W.2d 733 (Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 374 N.W.2d 733, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1272 (Mich. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Robert J. Karels for further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the [734]*734time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for oral argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the rules of Civil Appellate Procedure do not authorize the filing of a petition for further review by a party designated as an amicus curiae, the petition of Genty and Eggert, P.A. and Richard D. Genty for further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, denied. However, these parties are authorized to serve and file a brief as amicus curiae, said brief to be served and filed simultaneous with that of the petitioner Karels. The amicus curiae will not participate in oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Robert J. Karels for further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the [734]*734time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for oral argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the rules of Civil Appellate Procedure do not authorize the filing of a petition for further review by a party designated as an amicus curiae, the petition of Genty and Eggert, P.A. and Richard D. Genty for further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, denied. However, these parties are authorized to serve and file a brief as amicus curiae, said brief to be served and filed simultaneous with that of the petitioner Karels. The amicus curiae will not participate in oral argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 N.W.2d 733, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karels-v-american-family-mutual-insurance-co-minn-1985.