Karel v. State

145 So. 3d 937, 2014 WL 4087548, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12771
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2014·No. No. 2D14-931·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tisdol v. State, 794 So.2d 576 (Fla.2001); Lee v. State, 666 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Carson v. State, 37 So.3d 884 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Dupree v. State, 708 So.2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); McMillan v. State, 701 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Karel v. State, 145 So. 3d 937, 2014 WL 4087548, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 937 (Karel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State
666 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Dupree v. State
708 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Carson v. State
37 So. 3d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
McMillan v. State
701 So. 2d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Tisdol v. State
794 So. 2d 576 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)