KARDOSH v. MCCALLIN

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JULIA KARDOSH, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-1946 : CHERYL MCCALLIN, et al., : Defendants. :

ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2025, upon consideration of Plaintiff Julia Kardosh’s pro se Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum. 2. Kardosh’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155 (3d Cir. 1993). 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, J.