Kardor v. State
This text of 2016 ND 205 (Kardor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 11/9/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 205
Ibrahim P. Kardor, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20160140
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Rhiannon L. Gorham, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 101, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kardor v. State
[¶1] Ibrahim Kardor appeals a district court order denying him post-conviction relief. He argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective by failing to advise him of his opportunity to file a supplemental brief under N.D.R.App.P. 24. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kardor-v-state-nd-2016.